Showing posts with label mnscu. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mnscu. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Latest IFO Legislative Update: 4/2009 MnSCU Universities Dealing with Budget Issues

MNSCU UNIVERSITIES BRACE FOR BUDGET CUTS
by Connie Howard, IFO General Counsel

As the current budget crisis has unfolded over the past six months, the Inter Faculty Organization (IFO) represented faculty who have been bracing for the worst as university administrations have begun planning to deal with unprecedented budget cuts. Early settlement of the IFO’s 2009 – 2011 contract with Minnesota State Colleges and Universities (MnSCU) and the prospect of millions of dollars of temporary federal stimulus money have improved prospects. However, all of the MnSCU universities are scrambling to take steps to cut costs to deal with anticipated budget short falls.

So far only the administration at Minnesota State University Moorhead (MSU Moorhead) has announced that it anticipates retrenching probationary and tenured faculty. To encourage voluntary separations to reduce the need for lay offs, MSU Moorhead has entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the IFO extending the deadline for applying for unreduced Early Separation Incentive (ESI) and Early Notice of Retirement (ENR) benefits. The Faculty Associations at Bemidji State University (BSU) and Winona State University (WSU) are negotiating with their universities to offer similar incentives.

Minnesota State University Moorhead -
Moorhead has been hit by the triple blows of declining enrollments, state budget crisis and devastating flooding. According to MSU Moorhead FA President Cindy Phillips, the university is facing up to a $9.2 million decline in revenue for the 2009 – 2010 fiscal year. Of that figure, $4.2 million is a structural deficit resulting from the university’s failure to revise staffing levels as enrollments have declined. In addition, MSU Moorhead faces a $4 to $5 million shortfall as a result of the state budget crisis.

MSU Moorhead President Edna Szymanski first announced that the university was contemplating retrenchment – defined by the IFO/MnSCU contract as lay offs of probationary or tenured faculty – at the first university meet and confer in 2009. Since that announcement, the university has been evaluating and implementing a variety of cost cutting steps.
The administration has frozen searches on 11 vacant faculty positions and has made non-faculty staffing cuts. As noted above, the IFO and the university negotiated an MOA to encourage voluntary separations by extending the deadlines for faculty to apply for ESI and ENR benefits. The deadline for faculty to give notice of their intent to take advantage of the incentives is April 30, 2009. The number of faculty who choose to leave to get the benefits offered by the MOA will impact how many faculty will be retrenched.

Dr. Phillips says she anticipates that final decisions regarding faculty lay offs at MSU Moorhead will be announced at a meet and confer scheduled for May 7, 2009. Meanwhile, President Szymanski has asked deans to prepare recommendations for 5%, 10% and 15% budget cut scenarios. In addition, faculty have been working jointly with the administration to prioritize academic programs. Input from faculty and other interested parties will be evaluated by the Vice President for Academic Affairs and the University Budget Committee. However, the President will make the final decisions regarding budget cuts. St. Cloud State UniversitySt.

Cloud State University (SCSU) is bracing for a revenue shortfall of between $5 and $11 million for the 2009 – 2010 fiscal year. In preparation for a worst case scenario, President Earl Potter has asked each of his vice presidents to identify budget cuts equal to 7.5% ($11 million) of their budgets. However, President Potter has suggested that actual cuts are more likely to total between $5 and $6 million. The university does not plan to reduce its budget for adjunct faculty or for extra duty days. A number of cost cutting steps are being implemented that will affect faculty directly, including:

Freezing searches to fill 74 of 125 faculty positions currently vacant. Only 51 out of 125 requested searches are proceeding -- 35 for probationary and 16 for fixed term positions.
Eliminating 33 FTE of non-contractual reassigned time assignments. Faculty who lose reassigned time for other purposes will be assigned to teach additional classes to help backfill the 74 vacant positions, leaving over 40 positions unfilled.

Covering some of the over 40 vacant faculty positions by increasing average class sizes.
According to SCSU Faculty Association President John Palmer, the overwhelming majority of the budget reductions on the SCSU campus will be borne by faculty. Dr. Palmer says he anticipates “no retrenchment or ESI, just more work for the same pay.”
Minnesota State University MankatoAs of mid-March, Minnesota State University Mankato (MSU Mankato) was projecting a worst case budget deficit for the next biennium of $8.83 million. According to MSU Mankato Faculty Association President Don Larsson, all colleges have been asked to plan for budget cuts of up to 10%, but have been told that when cuts are made they will be targeted rather than made across-the-board.

Twenty-two (22) staff layoffs have been announced and a number of staff vacancies are going unfilled. MSU Mankato President Richard Davenport has announced significant administrative reorganizations. The Division of Student Affairs is being eliminated, along with the positions of Vice President for Student Affairs and two Assistant VP positions, among others. Faculty, students and staff have put forward about a dozen reorganization models for consideration. Dr. Larsson will be on a leadership group that will consider these models and make a recommendation by the summer. The Dean of Extended Learning has stepped down, and oversight of that office—which includes extended campus, the new satellite campus at 7700 France Avenue in Edina, and components of online learning—will be the responsibility of the Vice President for Strategic Partnerships Bob Hoffman. Several staff positions in the College of Extended Learning are among the recent cuts.
Following the settlement of the IFO/MnSCU collective bargaining agreement, President Davenport retracted plans to cut $900,000 earmarked to fund graduate assistants. However, Dr. Larsson reports that adjunct and fixed term vacancies are being cut in many departments and many probationary vacancies are being left unfilled or are being staffed temporarily through fixed term searches. No programs have been slated for program closures, but the FA anticipates that next year we will see some announcements department reorganizations and/or program cuts.


Winona State University - WSU anticipates a $4.2 million shortfall over the next academic year. According to WSU Faculty Association President Bruce Svingen, the administration has announced that it does not anticipate laying off any probationary or tenured faculty. However, WSU does intend to save between $770,000 and $1 million during the 2009 – 2010 year by eliminating some faculty and staff positions and leaving others vacant temporarily. WSU cost cutting plans include:
Eliminating one (1) faculty position in the Education Department.
Leaving vacant one (1) faculty position in Foreign Languages.
Cutting 10.6 FTE of non-contractual reassigned time.
Limiting the number of sections of multi-section courses to maximize the seat count per section.
WSU is exploring the possibility of entering into an MOA to extend the deadline for applying for ESI and ENR benefits for faculty in designated departments.
Dr. Svingen reports that after an initial attempt to persuade WSU faculty to take voluntary furloughs, the administration has backed off that idea. Instead, faculty are being encouraged to contribute to a voluntary fund. However, Dr. Svingen noted, the university has offered no guarantee that any money contributed will be used to save jobs, only that it will go towards deficit reduction.


Southwest Minnesota State University According to Southwest Minnesota State University (SMSU) Faculty Association President Jan Loft, thus far the administration on her campus has avoided uttering the “R” word (Retrenchment). However, the administration has proposed drastic steps to address the projected $2.6 million deficit for the 2009 – 2010 year. Those measures affecting faculty directly include:
Leaving vacant two (2) new faculty positions that had been approved, but whose funding was eliminated by the 2008 – 2009 unallotment.
Not renewing four (4) fixed term/adjunct positions.
Not renewing three (3) assistant coach positions.
Significantly reducing non-contractual reassigned time and extra duty days, in most cases by 50%.
In addition, the administration plans to make significant cuts involving staff outside the IFO bargaining unit, including not filling 21 staff vacancies, 21 lay-offs or position eliminations, and 2 reductions in position time. Dr. Lofts says, “Our administration is to the point where they say they are truly sorry. They hate this too, but no one has come up with a way to reduce the budget without hurting people.” More information will be forthcoming after a meeting scheduled the afternoon of April 15.


Bemidji State University (BSU) anticipates $2 million deficits in each of the next two years. BSU President Jon Quistgaard has told faculty that he anticipates $1 million of the shortfall for the 2009 – 2010 year will come from the budget administered by the BSU Vice President for Academic Affairs. Most IFO faculty salaries are paid from that budget. According to BSU Faculty Association President Christopher Brown, the administration has been decidedly short on details as to how the budget cuts will be accomplished. Mr. Brown reports that BSU has postponed making budget decisions for next year in hopes that federal stimulus funds will be available to offset the worst of the budget crisis.
Mr. Brown says that so far the administration has frozen searches for seven (7) probationary positions. In addition, faculty have been told to expect that non-contractual reassigned time will be cut, except for reassigned time dedicated to four (4) key areas (i.e. Higher Learning Commission accrediting efforts, Liberal Education curriculum, the Center for Professional Development and Assessment) In addition, the BSU FA is negotiating with the administration to extend the deadline for faculty to apply for unreduced ESI and ENR benefits to encourage voluntary departures.

Metropolitan State University’s (MSU) budget reserves and expanding enrollment have insulated faculty at the university from the worst of the financial woes plaguing the other MnSCU universities. Continued enrollment growth and a possible small tuition increase will be part of budget planning for 2010 that is still in process with an all university budget meeting scheduled for April 21.

House Omnibus Bonding Bill

The House Omnibus Bonding bill includes $67 Million for MnSCU projects (including Metro State's smart classroom project). The text can be viewed here (4/6): https://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/bin/bldbill.php?bill=H0855.3.html&session=ls86

Minnesota Audit Commission: Finalists for audits

More information on one of nine topic finalists: MnSCU System Offices and Expenditures Audit
The full list can be found here: http://www.auditor.leg.state.mn.us/ped/ped4.htm

Steve Drazkowski WDN article 4/1/09 -

Steve Drazkowski: Legislature gets an F on MnSCU negotiations
http://www.winonadailynews.com/articles/2009/04/01/opinion/otherviews/guest.txt

Friday, February 27, 2009

MnSCU's Marble Boat - Guest Editorial

Guest Editorial: MnSCU's Marble Boat
IFO Update Newsletter: October 2007
By Professor Darrell Downs, Winona State University

In the late 1800s, China's Empress Dowager built a boat of stone. In a desperate attempt to gild the declining Qing Dynasty, the Empress diverted funds aimed for the navy and built a faux marble boat at the Summer Palace-a nice place for a picnic, but not really a boat.

In 1995, the state universities, community colleges, and technical colleges were merged into a centralized system of higher education known as the MnSCU (Minnesota State Colleges and Universities). By its own account, MnSCU has reduced and/or merged community colleges, universities, and technical colleges from 45 to 32 separate institutions. The savings produced a new administrative apparatus and multi-million dollar central edifice to higher education reform. Some would prefer something more tangible.
For the full editorial click here: MnSCU's Marble Boat

As Chinese school children learned of the Empress Dowager's fabled ploy to use the Dynasty's passion for the latest in maritime technology to obscure her more craven interest in summer palace remodeling, we stand in awe of an equally misdirected trick if "technology" becomes the raison d'ĂȘtre of the Imperial Guard at MnSCU. If MnSCU ever had any clear reason for being, it was to serve the educational needs of the campuses. Technology is part of that picture, but technology should never rise above the more basic instructional needs of students. Nor should technology become an excuse for central administration to impose control over the varied academic disciplines of the state's colleges and universities. If that happens, even the most strident efforts by the legislature to rebuild the state's higher education system will be fruitless . . . and such is the case today. On the heels of the legislature's 12 percent increase in appropriations for MnSCU's two-year budget, the legitimacy of MnSCU's management of these new dollars is disappearing faster than the Peking Duck at a tourist vendors' convention.

Consider MnSCU's Central's latest fetish for instructional technology. Of the $151 million increase in funding for the biennium, $62.8 million is slated for technology. If a budget is an expression of agency priority, the clearest priority of MnSCU Central is instructional technology. Of course, MnSCU has declared that instructional technology dollars are headed for the campuses. But how do those technology dollars help the students who can't afford the tuition to attend class, or how do those dollars help campuses hire faculty to offer classes to meet the student demand? On-line courses you say? Perhaps to a small degree, but $62.8 million is no small degree. Virtual learning you say? Perhaps actual learning should be a higher priority. A new multi-million dollar experiment in leading edge curiosities leads me to wonder how we're helping the campuses in any tangible way for the majority of students. Undoubtedly, a few of the system's 170,000 plus students will salivate at the thought of taking courses via Second Life or other avatar friendly virtual worlds. Most students and faculty, however, live in an actual world that relies on classroom assignments, non-avatar professors, and they must pay actual and unfortunately increasing tuitions.

Could it be that MnSCU doesn't know how to estimate needs? Certainly, this is not easy for 32 separate institutions, but there is no better indicator of campus needs than the students and faculty of these campuses, or the elected representatives that voice their needs. Last year, the MN Senate appropriation bill allocated $10 million for technology for the biennium. The MN House bill similarly allocated $30 million. In the end, the legislature decided not to micromanage technology spending, and granted MnSCU the flexibility to serve the campuses in the best way possible. A reasonable person might think that MnSCU Central would consider the spirit of the final appropriation bill to aim for somewhere between $10 and $30 million for technology, and if in doubt it would ask the campuses about their priorities. Unfortunately, nobody on the campuses really believed that MnSCU Central would double the amount and, in doing so, ensure yet another unnecessary and divisive battle over scarce higher education funding. But then again, I suppose nobody really believed the Empress was building a marble boat.
Someday soon, we'll look at the MnSCU Imperial Palace and agree that it's a nice place for a picnic, but it has done little for education. Darrell “non-avatar professor” Downs.

Bruce A. Svingen's Testimony

Chair Pelowski, members of the committee.

My name is Bruce Svingen. I am the Faculty Association president at Winona State University. On behalf of our faculty I thank you for hearing our concerns.
With a $7 billion state deficit spread evenly across all state agencies, WSU would be facing at minimum a $6.2 million cut to base funding, this includes an expected enrollment increase by 200, a 4% tuition increase and the faculty’s proposal for a “no across the board” salary increases for the next two years.
At a $6.2 million deficit, the impacts are catastrophic:

1. The first impact is not filling positions needed to teach courses. If we took the $6.2 million entirely out of faculty positions, this would be a loss of 83 faculty and as much as 332 courses per semester, leaving all of our students a course short of a full load each semester. This would delay their graduation by one year at the same time we see a record high demand for our courses.

2. Secondly, as total course offerings decrease, departments will be driven to increase the number of lower division, less costly, courses in relation to upper division courses. If we’re not able to offer enough upper division classes, juniors and seniors will face further delays to graduation and entering the workforce. This uncertain sustainability of programs will jeopardize the University’s ability to recruit and retain students. Combined with the loss of $3 in tuition and fee revenue for every $1 in cuts under the projected deficit, this programmatic instability takes us toward the “death spiral” of the University.

3. The third impact is that higher tuition will limit accessibility and affordability at exactly the time our economy needs higher education to help rebuild our economy. Students have already faced an 85% tuition increases since 2001 and their average debt load upon graduation has blossomed to $24,000. With about 80% of our students staying in MN, burdening these students with more debt is another yoke on the state economy. According to Wilder and Associates, the positive regional economic impact of WSU is $194 million per year. This regional economic impact is now at great risk.

4. The fourth impact of large and destabilizing cuts will be more control over academic programs by the MnSCU System Office. This will not be guided by the academic needs of our students, but by the initiatives of the System Office and the Governor. We do not need trendy fixes, temporary reorganizations, or mandates for on-line education to create a student market – we already have a student demand for what we do. What we don’t need is a System Office spending $136 million/year that does not directly sustain the mission of the campuses, while spending only 40% of their budget on instructional support.

· We can sustain our mission without $20 million plus in System Office technology.
· We can sustain our mission without $20 million plus in the Chancellor’s office.
· We can sustain our mission without $20 million plus in administrative services.
· And we can sustain our campuses without 400 System Office employees.

We know this because we've done it before.

In closing, we are willing to make sacrifices. We have sacrificed wage increases for two years, we are pulling back operating budgets, and we are sacrificing positions.

But cuts alone may not be enough. We hope you will also consider “revenue enhancement” to help the campuses and other essential state services – one source of revenue to soften the blow to the campuses may be found in the MnSCU System Office. We would also ask that you consider tax reform as part of the solution. Coupled with this, we would suggest using one-time federal stimulus money to help soften the blow. And finally we suggest using the savings that come to the state via the PELL grant increases to reduce the cuts to public higher education. And if not that please uncouple the PELL grants from the state grant program so that are students can benefit directly from in the increased support.

Sincerely,

Bruce A. Svingen
President, WSUFA

Saturday, February 21, 2009

IFO get's it right: The Mankato Reporter weighs in!

Mankato Reporter: MSU-Mankato student paper
Editorial: Inter Faculty Organization gets it right
Issue date: 2/19/09

Now is not the time to be asking for pay raises, and fortunately, the Inter Faculty Organization appears to recognize that.The group struck a deal with the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system when negotiating a new contract earlier this month. The proposed two-year contract, which will be voted on by faculty next week, contains no across-the-board salary increases or annual step increases for faculty.No one should expect to be able to avoid at least some tightening of the belt during these tough economic times. In this case, the contract isn't even so much a tightening of the belt as it is a decision not to loosen the belt more.... [for more click here]

Editorial: Minnesota can ease fiscal pain by Cindy Phill

Editorial: Minnesota can ease fiscal pain
Inforum: The Forum for Fargo-Moorhead February 17 2009

It’s still a work in progress, but the budget meat grinder at the Minnesota Legislature likely will visit significant pain in two vital areas: education and aid to cities.

Gov. Tim Pawlenty and key lawmakers have said education will not be cut, but the increases for all of public education will be smaller than anticipated. It also appears funds committed previously to higher education will not be forthcoming, which translates into severe cuts because commitments based on those appropriations had already been made.... [full text click here]

Friday, February 20, 2009

IFO Savings to the University

From Russ Stanton (2/20/2009)

To give a 1% per year raise to IFO faculty costs $6.1 million.

Last year, when the Department of Finance sent out instructions to agencies to prepare their budget requests, the agencies were told to build in a 3% per year compensation inflation.

Thus, the tentative contract settlement will help reduce compensation costs to the universities by about $18 million over the biennium compared to original estimated costs.
Faculty are doing their part to solve the budget shortfall and prevent layoffs.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

WDN: Time for a miniscule MnSCU office

The Winona Daily News "Our View" opinion page article on MnSCU Central (2/11/09):
Our view: Time for a miniscule MnSCU office

Monday, February 9, 2009

Governor's response to the MnSCU budget request

The Governor’s response to the MnSCU budget request (1/30/2009): http://www.mmb.state.mn.us/doc/budget/narratives/gov/mnscu.pdf

Education must be priority in Minnesota by Paul Harris (MSU-Moorhead)

Paul Harris (MSU-Moorhead) had an article published February 7,2009 in Inforum: A forum of Fargo-Moorhead

Education must be priority in Minnesota
Minnesota faces severe budget problems as a result of the national recession, and everyone who receives state funding knows that some cuts are inevitable. In deciding where to make those cuts, one question should be paramount: How can we weather this crisis while doing the least possible long-term damage to the state? At some point our economy will begin to turn around, and Minnesota should position itself for a strong recovery. For Minnesota to thrive in today’s world, a highly educated work force is vital, and no one contributes more to that than Minnesota State University Moorhead, Minnesota State Community and Technical College, and the other institutions that comprise the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities (MnSCU). The system’s institutions graduate almost 34,000 people each year, more than 80 percent of whom remain in the state and find jobs related to their field of study. Despite steep tuition increases in recent years, it remains the most accessible alternative for people, both young and not so young, who are looking to improve their lives in hard times. Minnesotans used to understand the importance of education, but we have slipped markedly in recent years. Thirty states now spend a larger percentage of their personal incomes on public higher education than we do, including Alabama, Mississippi and Arkansas. Now Gov. Tim Pawlenty proposes once again to make disproportionate cuts to funding for public higher education. His recommendation seems perfectly wrongheaded if the state hopes to rebound strongly. To put it in perspective, his proposed cut of $146 million to the MnSCU system is the equivalent of about 975 faculty positions. If adopted, it would mean larger classes, fewer choices for students, and poorer facilities. Pawlenty says we must do more with less. My reply is, “You get what you pay for.” Thanks to a dedicated faculty, MSUM students still receive an excellent education, but if our funding continues to deteriorate, quality is bound to suffer. Minnesota must rededicate itself to the principle that the key to a bright future is investing in people.

Friday, February 6, 2009

We need your help: Participate in events (part 3)

Support Higher Education – Events around WSU
February 3, 2009 10:30-12noon - MPR in Kryzko Commons
February 5, 2009 at 4:00pm - WSU Faculty Association forum on the budget
February 13, 2009 at 11:00am-1:00pm - WSU and SE Tech Student sponsored event (Kryzko Commons basement and at 12noon in the WSU quad area)

February 11-12, 2009 -Lobby days for IFO (government relations and IFO leadership)
February 20, 2009 - Winona- Budget Town Hall meeting with Minnesota legislators Location/time: Winona City Hall-Council Chambers (207 Lafayette) at 3:30pm
March 3, 2009 - Budget Forecast

We need your help: Write your Legislator (part 1)

Please consider writing a brief note to legislators that emphasizes the potential impact of budget cuts on campus and perhaps your thoughts on how the state might address could find the revenue to minimize the damage. The House and Senate have set up blogs on their web sites for public input on the budget (see links below). Further down the page (and on the right of this site) are links to the higher education committees and campus area legislators.

Legislature Blogs
http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/budgetsuggestions.asp
http://budgetforum.senate.mn/?cat=5

Additional helpful links:

Senate Higher Ed
http://www.senate.leg.state.mn.us/committees/committee_bio.php?cmte_id=2003&ls=#members

House Higher Ed
http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/comm/committeemembers.asp?comm=86116


CAMPUS AREA LEGISLATORS 2009 - Contact Information

WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY – DISTRICT 30 (Rochester)

Rep. Tina Liebling (DFL)
State Office Building Room 553
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
651/296-0573
rep.tina.liebling@house.mn
P.O. Box 6332
Rochester, MN 55903
507/289-4664

Rep. Andy Welti (DFL)
State Office Building Room 389
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
651/296-4378
rep.andy.welti@house.mn
RR 2 Box 17
Plainview, MN 55964
507/951-8857

Sen. Ann Lynch (DFL)
Capitol Room G-24
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
651/296-4848
sen.ann.lynch@senate.mn
4479 Ettenmoor Lane SW
Rochester, MN 55902
507/281-9297

Rep. Kim Norton (DFL)
State Office Building Room 387
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
651/296-9249
rep.kim.norton@house.mn
P.O.Box 6766
Rochester, MN 55903
507-280-6273

WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY – DISTRICT 31
Rep. Gene Pelowski Jr. (DFL)
State Office Building Room 491
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
651/296-8637
rep.gene.pelowski@house.mn
257 Wilson Street
Winona, MN 55987
507/454-9500

Rep. Greg Davids (R)
State Office Building Room 283
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
651/296-9278
rep.greg.davids@house.mn
P.O. Box 32
Preston, MN 55965
507-765-4795

Sen. Sharon Erickson Ropes (DFL)
Capitol Room G-24
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
651/296-5649
sen.sharon.erickson.ropes@senate.mn
978 Gilmore Avenue
Winona, MN 55987
507/454-5447

WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY – DISTRICT 28B
Rep. Steve Drazkowski (R)
State Office Building Room 247
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155
651/296-2273
rep.steve.drazkowski@house.mn
14369 654th Street
Wabasha, MN 55981
651/565-3711

BEMIDJI STATE UNIVERSITY – DISTRICT 4
Rep. Frank Persell (DFL)
State Office Building Room 529
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
651/296-5516
rep.frank.persell@house.mn
2435 Staghorn Lane
Bemidji, MN 56601
218/751-2770

Rep. Larry Howes (R)
State Office Building Room 201
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
651/296-2451
rep.larry.howes@house.mn
5340 Ladyslipper Lane NW
Walker, MN 56484
218/547-4707

Sen. Mary Olson (DFL)
Capitol Room 124
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
651/296-4913
sen.mary.olson@senate.mn
7332 Fergeson Court NE
Bemidji, MN 56601
218/444-6339

METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY – DISTRICT 58
Rep. Bobby Joe Champion (DFL)
State Office Building Room 329
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
651/296-8659
rep.bobby.champion@house.mn

Downs and Svingen's letter in the Winona Post

Darrell Downs and Bruce Svingen's letter to the editor, titled "Urge MnSCU to prioritize campus level funding," was published in the Winona Post (1/14/09) and an abridged version, titled "Stop the MnSCU Shell Game," in the Winona Daily News (1/22/09).
http://www.winonapost.com/stock/functions/VDG_Pub/detail.php?choice=28873&home_page=&archives=1

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Article in the Minnesota Independent: Raise taxes? Rukavina broaches the taboo

Raise taxes? Rukavina broaches the taboo
By Paul Demko 2/3/09 5:26 PM

Raising taxes to solve the state’s looming $5 billion budget deficit has generally been a verboten subject. Gov. Tim Pawlenty, not surprisingly, has stuck to the no-new-taxes mantra that’s been the guiding philosophy of his two terms in office. His fellow Republicans at the Capitol have been equally adamant that the budget must be fixed without revenue increases.
Even Democrats have been reluctant to broach the topic of tax increases. Since Pawlenty unveiled his budget proposal last week, the party’s leadership has been notably vague in detailing what alternatives they might suggest for fixing the state’s fiscal crisis. Instead the Democrats have promised a two-week “listening tour” to hear how average Minnesotans suggest closing the deficit.

But there’s at least one legislator who’s not shy about suggesting that taxes need to be raised: Rep. Tom Rukavina. At the start of today’s meeting of the Higher Education and Workforce Development Finance and Policy Division, the Iron Range Democrat declared it “nuts” to believe the massive deficit can be fixed without additional revenues.
“The governor’s got to understand he helped create this mess and now he has to help solve it,” Rukavina said. “As much as he wants to starve the beast and cut government, I think this monster’s gotten out of control.”

Click here for the rest of the story/article.